Nexant, Inc.
Stationary Fuel Cells
Keywords: market, nexant, petrochemical, developments, size, report, information, chemical


Full Report Price: $6,500.00
Sections: starting at $75.00
Delivery: Immediate Online Access
Publication Date: 10-NOV-03

Format: PDF document  PDF Electronic Document
Add to Cart image

-- or --       



Report Description

Background

Fuel cells (FC) have received a tremendous amount of attention in the press, government and academic R&D programs, government policy formation, and among investors. Billions of dollars annually are being expended worldwide on FCs and related developments among thousands of organizations. FCs are a revolutionary and potentially widely applicable technology that is also somewhat misunderstood and perhaps over-expected by investors and the public at large.

The recent severe blackout in the northeastern United States and in Canada that affected 50 million people has spurred increased interest and boosted stock prices of FC industry players, given the fact that the lights stayed on at hospitals, businesses and other locations with on-site generation (to which some FCs are targeted). Indeed, some in the New York City area and in Canada were already using FCs. Overall, interest in FCs for central and distributed power generation is being driven by deregulation of the electric power industry in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere, along with the problems this has partially wrought with aging power transmission systems and the demand for natural gas. The "9/11" tragedy has also widened interest in power security, which distributed power generation using FCs can help address.

Beyond some recent advances in several aspects of the basic, ancillary and enabling technologies, fuel cells will require much more research and development and a several-fold decrease in price before they are widely adopted for the variety of applications that are proposed for them. The engineering development and price reduction challenges fall into several key categories that should be of interest to PERP subscribers:

  • Materials - polymer and ceramic membrane materials; catalysts for fuel processors (reforming, water gas shift, etc.), flue gas conversion and guarding against sulfur, CO and other FC poisons; seal systems; polymer, composite and metallic structures

  • Manufacturing systems - many are similar to those used in the semiconductor, consumer electronics or ceramics industries, as well as the automotive assembly sector and its components supply chain

  • System integration - largely chemical and electronic engineering issue to be solved

The several competing types of FCs each have strong proponents in industry, government and academia. The public discourse about FCs is colored by the priorities and agendas of these champions, and their positioning for the purposes of commercial advantage (product sales and stock price), public image or sharing in public funding of R&D. There is also great confusion over FCs for vehicle applications contrasted with stationary applications, and over-association of both with the very tenuous development of a postulated "hydrogen economy".

In the 1960s, NASA adopted alkaline-type fuel cells for its space program. Since their initial use in space, fuel cells have been improved and are becoming commercially available in products such as: residential and small business power generators; commercial and industrial power-and-heat cogenerators operating on purchased fuels and waste gases; and larger-scale stationary power generators. They are expected to be available in the future in automobiles, computers and cell phones. Fuel cells also have potential as independent or distributed power providers for credit card processing centers, jails, cellular phone towers, mining equipment, communication centers, navigation equipment, road signs, defense installations, urban transit buses, in truck cabs and even portable household appliances.

Operating Principles


Generically, a fuel cell uses an electrochemical process to generate electrical power through catalytic oxidation of a fuel.

Figure 1, below, illustrates a generic fuel cell operation.

In its simplest chemical form, the fuel cell catalytically oxidizes hydrogen using the following steps:

  • Hydrogen molecules adsorb on the surface of the anode catalyst

  • The hydrogen molecule is split, with the two resulting atoms being ionized to H+ ions (protons) with the residual electrons being conducted away through an electrical circuit

  • Protons desorb from the anode catalyst and diffuse through an electrolyte layer to the cathode, driven by potential and diffusion gradients

  • At the cathode, oxygen molecules are adsorbed and split into individual atoms

  • The oxygen atoms accept free electrons from the electrical circuit to form O2- ions

  • Finally, two protons combine with the O2- ions to form water, which desorbs from the cathode - nitrogen in the air is vented from the cathode area and carries off waste heat

Figure 1:
Fuel Cell Operation


IMAGE: PERPN02S6-1

A voltage potential develops across the cell, due to the concentrations of hydrogen ions at the anode and oxygen ions at the cathode. This, combined with the free electrons that are available to travel through the external circuit result in the fuel cell providing useful power, derived from the energy available in the oxidation process. Individual cell voltages are generally too low for larger scale practical applications. To get higher voltages and more power, many cells are ganged together in a stack.

Fuel Cell Types

There are four major types of fuel cells currently under development with mass market potential today:

  • Two low temperature types
    • Proton exchange membrane (PEMFC)
    • Phosphoric acid (PAFC)

  • Two high temperature types
    • Solid oxide (SOFC)
    • Molten carbonate (MCFC)

The PEMFC and SOFC types use solid-state ionic exchange membranes, while the PAFC and MCFC types are based on liquid ionic exchange media. Two versions of SOFC are being developed, planar and tubular, each having distinct potential advantages in manufacturing and operating characteristics.

This report focuses on SOFCs for stationary applications, and presents technical, commercial, and practical evidence for this choice. Patterns emerging in the multi-faceted, complex, entrepreneurial, and politically-charged field of fuel cell development that support this view are detailed.

The drivers for stationary FCs are primarily:

  • Higher fuel conversion efficiencies for electricity generation, in general, than heat engine generator sets (e.g., for natural gas, 40-60 percent versus 25-45 percent)

  • Modular designs afford the same high efficiencies at low capacities as high capacities for distributed generation (DG)

  • Lower emissions, quieter, more compact than heat engine generator sets

  • No moving parts, potentially allowing more feasible untended startup on demand and lower maintenance costs

  • DC electricity generation can yield improved power quality

  • Potential for combined heat and power generation (CHP)

The relevance and degree of each of these drivers varies with the application, fuel, and type of FC. For example, DC power quality and untended startup are not as important features in central power plants as they may be at remote sites, while high fuel efficiency and low emissions are key for large utility and industrial applications. In contrast to both of these cases, small CHP/DG systems are generally targeted at residential, commercial and industrial sites, and are not relevant to power plants or remote emergency power systems.

Stationary FCs will continue to compete, for R&D resources and commercially, with rapidly-developing wind and solar energy, especially combined with advanced batteries and other energy storage media for remote and emergency power and DG, and with fully commercial microturbines for CHP/DG.

All the types of fuel cells continue to have many technical challenges to overcome. In particular, ceramic membrane-based solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), in both tubular and planar membrane configurations, face challenges of durability and cost. However, they are also capable of mass production and have other excellent characteristics for stationary power applications.

At a typical price of $4,500/kW in 2003, fuel cell technology is not ready to compete in the market, as seen in Table 1.

Table 1:
Fuel Cells Compared to Other Stationary Energy Technologies



Generation TechnologyTypical Installed Capital Cost(US$ per kilowatt)CHPCapabilityAirEmissions
Gas Turbine700 to 900YesSmall
Microturbine450 to 1000YesSmall
Steam Turbine800 to 1000YesModerate
Wind Turbine800 to 1300NoNone
Natural Gas IC Engine200 to 350YesModerate
Fuel Cell3700 to 5000YesNegligible
Solar Photovoltaic (PV)over 5000NoNone

This report also discusses:

  • Characteristics/issues of fuel cell types

  • Environmental drivers and issues

  • Auxiliary requirements (fuel generation, fuel/effluent treating, power conditioning, heat recuperation, etc.)

  • Profiles of developers of SOFC (and other types)

  • Chemical manufacturer opportunities in SOFC materials

  • Market assessment and competing technologies for SOFC in DG/CHP applications.

Figure 2 illustrates the applicability of the various fuel cell types to segments of the distributed generation market.

Figure 2:
Fuel Cell Distributed Generation Market Sectors


IMAGE: PERPN02S6-2



Table of Contents: Stationary Fuel Cells
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Fuel Cell Overview
BASICS OF FUEL CELL TECHNOLOGY
Fuel Cell Types
CHARACTERISTICS OF FUEL CELL TYPES
ENVIRONMENTAL DRIVERS AND ISSUES
APPLICATIONS AND MARKETS
Stationary Submarkets
Figure 2.1 Fuel Cell Distributed Generation Market Sectors
FC Fuel Efficiency
Figure 2.2 Comparative Efficiencies of Electric Power Generators
Other Market Factors
Cost Competitiveness
Table 2.2 Fuel Cells Compared to Other Stationary Energy Technologies
Table 2.3 Energy Technologies in CHP Applications
Fuel Options
Vehicular FCs
Small Portable/Mobile FCs
DEVELOPERS AND COMMERCIAL STATUS
Operating Principals
Figure 2.3 Fuel Cell Operation
Figure 2.4 Operating Curves for FCs and ICEs
Efficiency Versus Peak Power
Figure 2.5 Efficiencies of Fuel Cells Versus Heat Engines as a Function of Temperature
Individual Fuel Cell Technologies
Figure 2.6 Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell (PAFC)
Figure 2.7 Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC)
Figure 2.8 Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC)
Figure 2.9 Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC)
Figure 2.10 Schematic Diagram Of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell System Incorporating Fuel Processor
Figure 2.11 Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC)
Reformer Systems
Figure 2.12 Efficiency Losses in Overall Fuel Cell Systems
Applications Issues and Progress
Table 2.4 Applications Related To Fuel Cell Issues
Stationary versus Mobile Fuel Cell System Development Needs
STATIONARY POWER AND HEAT - APPLICATIONS AND MARKETS
Market Sectors
Fuel Cell Technology Issues
OVERVIEW
PHOSPHORIC ACID FUEL CELL (PAFC)
ALKALINE FUEL CELL (AFC)
MOLTEN CARBONATE FUEL CELL (MCFC)
SOLID OXIDE FUEL CELL (SOFC)
RTESP - SOFC
PROTON EXCHANGE MEMBRANE FUEL CELL (PEMFC)
DIRECT METHANOL FUEL CELL (DMFC)
BOP - BALANCE OF PLANT
Fuel Processors
Power Conditioning
Heat Recuperation
Stationary Fuel Cell Developers
STATIONARY FC DEVELOPMENT STATUS
Table 4.1 Leading Stationary Fuel Cell Developers
SOFC DEVELOPMENT STATUS
SOFC Developer Profiles
Figure 4.1 Pressurized SOFC Module
MCFC Developer Profiles
PEMFC Developer Profiles
Table 4.2 Premium Power User's Typical Cost for a One-Hour Interruption
PAFC Developer Profiles
AFC Developer Profile
SOFC Materials: Chemical Manufacturer Opportunities
SOFC CHARACTERISTICS AND ISSUES
Characteristics
MATERIALS NEEDS
Solid Oxide Membranes
Other Materials
Market Assessment
DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND CHP
DSM - Peak Shaving & "Negawatts"
Residential/Commercial/Institutional Buildings
CHP/DG TECHNOLOGY - COMPETITION/INTEGRATION
Overview of Competing CHP/DG technologies
Table 6.1 Energy Technologies Competing With Fuel Cells
Microturbines
Figure 6.1 Capstone MicroTurbine
Figure 6.2 MicroTurbine Emissions Reduction Benefits
Gas Diesel
Other Competing technologies for remote DG
STATIONARY FC MARKET DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT
Relationship with Vehicle Markets
Figure 6.3 Fuel Cell Market and Pricing Expectations

 

Nexant ChemSystems Reports

Browse other Nexant research reports by category:

Process Evaluation/Research Planning - PERP

Petroleum and Petrochemical Economics - PPE

PolyOlefin Planning Service - POPS

Topical Reports

About Nexant

Nexant, Inc. helps clients unlock the value of their energy assets by enabling them to make informed decisions with greater confidence, speed, and reliability. Our goal is to help clients sucessfully meet the challenges they face in the global energy market.

Home  Browse  Search  E-mail  Content Map
Nexant, Inc., 101 Second Street, 11th Floor, San Francisco CA
Tel: (415) 369-1000    Fax: (415) 369-9700